Webon the employee choice doctrine in Lucente v. International Business Machines Corporation when it held that IBM’s cancellation of a former executive’s equity awards when he went to work for a competitor did not violate New York law.8 Employers may also seek to rely on New York’s “faithless servant” doctrine to enforce a clawback. WebFeb 5, 1999 · However, in the context of a benefit compensation plan, New York recognizes an exception to the rule of reasonableness: the employee choice doctrine. Under this rule, an employee who receives benefits conditioned on not competing with the conferring employer has the choice of preserving his benefits by refraining from competition or …
A "Constructive" Decision: The Employee Choice Doctrine Is Alive …
WebMay 1, 2007 · The employee choice doctrine is based on the premise that a resigning employee is given the choice of either preserving his or her right to compensation by refraining from engaging in competitive employment, or forfeiting that right by choosing to compete with a former employer. The New York Court of Appeals' recent decision in … WebFeb 19, 2015 · Companies with employees in New York should be aware that each of these four interesting developments impacts the basic enforceability of non-compete and … melania trump outfits yesterday
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS: LIMITS AND …
WebJun 5, 2002 · New York Times Co., 501 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1974), this Court suggested that the employee choice doctrine no longer applied in New York because, inter alia, few cases had relied on it since Kristt. As it turned out, however, the reports of the doctrine's demise were greatly exaggerated. Webemployment choice doctrine. Under the employee choice doctrine, “New York courts will enforce a restrictive covenant without regard to its reasonableness if the employee has … WebNov 24, 2015 · The case appeared in the November 27, 2015 edition of the New York Law Journal. ... The Court specifically found that, under the employee-choice doctrine, the agreement NBTY sought to enforce had already expired by virtue of the fact that the individual defendants decided not to exercise the option. napier mens clothing stores